About
This blog is all about the voice of the Stupid Common Man in the system and how he can become an integral part of it for better management.
7 Comments »
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- October 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (2)
- January 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (2)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (5)
- November 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (4)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
I had sent an email ot all members of the Lok Sabha on their email addresses given in your above site. Many of the email addresses seems to be wrong as the mail has not been delivered.So I am appending my mail below so that all MPs may go through it and fulfil their obligations towards senior citizens-LIC pensioners : Kindly update/ correct the email addresses of all MPs.
Hon’ble
MEMBER of PARLIAMENT
Dear Sir/Madam,
Sub: LIC PENSIONERS CRY FOR JUSTICE and their just demands are:
(1) 100% neutralization of DR(dearness relief) to those LIC pensioners also who retired before 1.8,1997.
(2) Up gradation of pension consequent upon revision of Pay Scales (as is done for
Central & State Governments Pensioners).
¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬————————————————————————————————————–
RETIRED EMPLOYEES(PENSIONERS) OF LIC OF INDIA, WHO HAVE LAID SOLID FOUNDATIONS OF COUNTRY’S LARGEST INSURANCE COMPANY AND ALSO ONE OF THE BIGGEST FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, FEEL PROUD OF ITS GROWTH AND TREMENDOUS FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THE CENTRAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS IN DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING.INDUSTRY, ELECTRICITY, ROADS, WATER SUPPLY, SEAWRAGE ETC.ETC. Total Assets of the Corporation amounted to Rs 1152057 crores as on 31.03.2010.
WHILE LIC HAS GRACIOUSLY DISTRIBUTED THE FRUITS OF ITS STRONG FINANCIAL BASE, TO THE EXISTING EMPLOYEES BY WAY OF HEFTY INCLEASE IN EMOLUMENTS, PERKS & A RECENT BONANZA OF DAILY LUNCH COUPONS (which we do not resent), BUT NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE TO REMOVE THE GLARING ANOMALIES AND DISCRIMINATION IN THE PAYMENT OF PENSION & DR TO THE PENSIONERS WHO HAVE BEEN CRYING FOR JUSTICE FOR THE LAST OVER 15 YEARS.
EVEN THE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT FAVOURABLE ORDERS TO IMPLIMENT LIC BOARD’S OWN RESOLUTION IN THIS REGARD HAS BEEN IGNORED AND LIC (AT THE BEHEST OF THE Ministry Of Finance, GOVT. OF INDIA) PREFERRED TO GO IN FOR APPEAL before Division Bench , RAJASTHAN HIGH CCOURT, JAIPUR .
FURTHER MOF DID NOT CARE FOR ITS OWN GOVT. LITIGATION POLICY OF NOT TO PREFER APPEALS, IN MATTERS RELATING TO PENSIONERS, NOR THEY LISTENED TO VARIOUS DELEGATES OR EVEN THE ADVICE OF GREAT LIUMINARIES OF THE STATUS OF A ILLUSTRIOUS RETIRED SUPREME COURT JUDGE HON’BLE V R KRISHNA IYER. HIS DO LETTER DATED JULY 17, 2010 ADDRESSED TO THE FINANACE MINISTER IS APPENDED BELOW FOR YOUR KIND PERUSAL.
HUNDREDS OF PENSIONERS HAVE ALREADY DIED AND MANY ARE IN DECEMBER OF THEIR LIFE FIGHTING FOR THEIR LIVING IN THESE DAYS OF UNCONTROLLABLE PRISE RISE AND HIGH COST MEDICAL TREATMENT.
TO MITIGATE PENSIONERS SUFFERINGS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LIC OF INDIA HAD PASSED A RESOLUTION AS BACK AS ON 24 NOV.2001 ALLOWING 100% neutralization of DR(dearness relief) to those LIC pensioners also who retired before 1.8,1997 AND Up gradation of pension consequent upon revision of Pay Scales (as is done for Central & State Governments Pensioners). LIC HAD SENT THE RESOLUTION TO THE MOF, GOVT. OF INDIA FOR APPROVAL (though the same was not required).
BUT IN SPITE OF RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT RECENT DIRECTIONS TO LIC TO IMPLIMENT ITS OWN ABOVE SAID RESOLUTION, LIC, INSTEAD OF HONOURING THE HON’BLE HC ORDERS, PREFERRED TO GO IN FOR APPEAL ( of course at the behest of the MOF GOVT.OF INDIA) AND THEIR APPEAL IS LYING WITH HON’BLE DIVISION BENCH OF RJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JAIPUR FOR HEARING/ADMISSION.
YOU BEING THE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE AND BY THE PEOPLE HAVE A MORAL DUTY AND RESPONSIBILITY TO HELP PEOPLE PARTICULARLY THE SENIOR CITIZENS LIKE LIC PENSIONERS WHO ARE SUFFERING AND HAVE BEEN DIFFERENTIATED ONLY BECAUSE OF CALLOUS ATTITUDE OF THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF INDIA. KINDLY EXERT YOUR GOOD OFFICES AND PERSUADE THE MOF, GOVT. OF INDIA FOR NOT ONLY WITHDRAWING THE APPEAL BUT ALSO TO IMPLIMENT LIC BOARD RESOLUTION AND HELP THE PENSIONERS-SENIOR CITIZENS WHO ARE AT THE FAG END OF THEIR LIVES, SO THAT THEY GET JUSTICE AND MPs ALSO FUL FIL THEIR OBLIGATIONS.
SOLICITING THE FAVOUR OF AN EARLY ACTION.
WITH REGARDS FROM
LIC PENSIONERS-SENIOR/SUPER SENIOR CITIZENS.
H K AGGARWAL, 556 SECTOR-54, MOHALI,CHANDIGARH.
O9855002556.
———————————————————————————————-Letter of Justice V R KRISHNA IYER————————————-
July 17, 2010
My dear Pranab Mukherjee,
I have a vague recollection of having a big public meeting in Calcutta years ago. I wonder if you have recollection of me or that meeting.
I write this letter for a public cause so necessary for a class of people who need most support from Government. I am happy you have been sworn into high office as Finance Minister of India. You have done us great and in a country of deprivation and indigent it is important that a man of your vision and socialist mission should become vibrant ‘to wipe every tear from every eye’ if I may quote from Nehru’s historic tryst with destiny speech over Independence Day on 15.8.1947. May I disclose to you the pathetic condition of a class of people arbitrarily alienated from the beneficial stream of pensioners in the LIC. What is arbitrary is unconstitutional as a Constitution Bench has held in the Supreme Court in Maneka Gandhi’s case (Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597).
Here is a case of arbitrariness which I dare say has been overlooked by your ministry and must be set right once it is discovered. The older the age of the pensioner the greater the need for liberal pension since age invites infirmity. I know this to my cause at age 95 by way of income tax benefit. The LIC pensioners are one integral group and cannot be divided into different classes. Date is an irrelevant factor when alteration in pension was made. The Supreme Court again in a weighty judgment observed that the date of variation cannot be the basis of differential pension (Vide Nakara v. Union of India, AIR 1983 SC 130: (1983) 1 SCC 305: (1983) 1 LLJ 104].
Facts which has lead to this anomaly are as follows:-
It has been alleged by the LIC Board where a resolution passed by them on 24.11.2001 rectifying the disparity in the calculation of Dearness allowance to pensioners of the LIC before and after 31.7.1997, has been kept in abeyance for want of financial sanction from your ministry. The court had directed the LIC to implement the resolution of the Board dt. 23.11.2001 stating that the corporation
cannot hold different criteria for granting D.A based on the cut of date i.e. 31.7.1997. The LIC is also not able to approach the court again as per the provisions of the national litigation policy announced by your ministry on 23.6.2010.
I, therefore feel that your ministry in all fairness instruct the LIC to implement court judgment, simultaneously giving financial concurrence for its implementation by your ministry.
I am enclosing the papers connected with this received by me with a prayer that immediate action in the matter is called for as a humanitarian and patriotic duty which otherwise will adversely affect the old aged pensioners who may be deprived of their benefits if prolonged further.
In the light of my submission above and out of consideration for humanism, justice and constitution fairness kindly accord financial concurrence to the court order. Surely these unfortunate section as they draw their pension on a just basis will bless you and your Government. I too will. Statesman like action without delay will be a boon to the forsaken pensioners.
With regards,
Yours sincerely,
V.R. KRISHNA IYER
Encl : as above
To
Shri. Pranab Mukherjee
Hon’ble Minister for Finance
Government of India
New Delhi
India Is Corrupt; Because Judiciary is Corrupt
Punch Line:- “Indian ‘JUDICIARY & DEMOCRACY’ is in DANGER; when 867 Judges, forming Vertical Section of Indian Judiciary, who have NEVER Learned to OBEY the LAW are given THE RIGHT to COMMAND”
Our Aim:- To have ABLE JUDGEs to preside the Courts ; Who are Impartial, Clean, Good, Transparent , Accountable to People and Rule-of-Law.
Why? : – It is the Indian JUDICIARY; which ultimately decides whether or not a person is Corrupt, Criminal, Fraud, Cheat, Contemner etc.,.
Appeal: – We solicit Your Support of Men & Resources; to “prosecute 867 Judges, forming Vertical Section of Indian Judiciary”.
Bottom Line:- “CORRUPTION in JUDICIARY, If you cannot Fight or Scared ; please support us to Fight”.
For more visit:- http://www.JudgesPlot4Plot.com http://www.IndianCorruptJudges.com
National TV Videos in support of our Investigations:- Visit Youtube.com ‘http://www.youtube.com/user/indianscandal’ & http://www.youtube.com/user/Digvijaymote
Fourteen Years Accredited JUDICIALLY Investigated Scam; approved by Legislature, Government & Indian Courts.
“Centre for Investigation & Prosecution of Corrupt Judges of India”
Your Support / Report of Corruption in Judiciary to :- indiancorruptjudges@gmail.com
Judges’ Crimes Differentiated from rest of Indians, like ministers / IAS / IPS / Businessmen/ common man, etc Codified:- The standard of conduct required of a judge is higher than that of others and what may be permissible in others may not be permissible in a judge. Judicial officers cannot have two standards, one in the Court and another outside the Court. it is also necessary to protect the fair image of the institution of the judiciary from those judges who choose to conduct themselves in a manner as to blur that image. It is not confined to criminal acts or to acts prohibited by law. It is confined to acts which are contrary to law. It is not confined to acts connected with the judicial office. It extends to all activities of a judge, public or private This case shows that a judge may not depart from the high standard of rectitude expected of a judge even outside the court and he may be subjected to disciplinary action even for acts unconnected with his judicial duties. Judicial office is essentially a public trust, and the right of the people to revoke this trust is fundamental. He (Judge) should conduct himself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
A.T.Ramaswamy,
Chairman,
Joint Legislative Committe,
[Investigation Committee of Identifying Government Land Grabbing in Bangalore
Urban & Bangalore Rural Districts]
Tel : 080-22250702
Fax: 080-22258301
email: atramaswamyjc@yahoo.co.in
Room No. 121, Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore-560001.
Date: 29.05.2007
To:
Shri G.T. Devegowda,
Minister for Co-operation,
Govt. of Karnataka, Vidhana soudha, Bangalore 560 001
Dear Hon’ble Minister,
Karnataka state Judicial department Employees’ House Building Co-operative Housing Society having formed Layout, has Distributed Sites. Said Layout is formed without getting Layout Plan Approved from B.D.A, has formed an Illegal layout. The Said Society, in forming Illegal layout, has violated Section 79[A] 79[B] of Land reforms Act & Completely violated Land Revenue Act. Places/ Sites Reserved for Civic Amenity Sites / Public Places, is sold away. Society in forming Illegal layout, has violated every Directions issued time-to-time from various Govt. Departments & Courts; has acted as per its own Fancies & wishes, by throwing All orders into Winds. In the Court also, Court has Rejected “Society’s Un-Conditional Apology for the Contempt of Court” stating that Apology is not worth of trusting. Further the President of Society has filed a Criminal case against the Secretary of the very Society for having Forged Records & having Registered Sites illegally, exhibits the Serious kinds of Illegal Activities, society has indulged into.
The Society instead of working as per Law, is working as “Real Estate Agent”. It is Clear that the concerned Governmental Departments including Co-operative department, have failed completely in their duties to see that Society works as per law; but on contrary it looks like the departments have fallen prey to the influence of Society & have utterly failed in their respective duties for having failed to initiate timely action against Illegal activities of this Society. The Investigations reveal that this Society’s Illegal activities have Topped list of Cheating & Frauds in this State, by the way Society has violated Gravest-of Grave Laws. I feel pity to Express, JUDICIAL LAY-OUT, has become MOTHER of ALL ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES. Committee has received Complaints that stating that other Societies have also indulged in Similar illegal Activities.
Therefore to take stringent Action against illegal activities of Karnataka state Judicial department Employees’ House Building Co-operative Housing Society, it is Recommended to supersede the Society forthwith & to initiate Criminal prosecution against persons who are responsible for for such nefarious Activities.
With regards, Yours faithfully,
….Signed….
[A.T. Ramaswamy]
CHAIRMAN
120 High Court & Supreme Court Judges Site Details = Judicial Layout 1st Phase 84 Judges +
Others missing from ATR list 23 + Judicial Layout 2nd Phase 13 Judges
ATR.Judicial Layout – 1st Phase: 84 High Court & Supreme Court Judges Site Details
Other High Court & Supreme Court Judges Site Details not included in Judicial Layout – 1st Phase, which are missing in ATR report
judicial layout phase 2; Talgatpura on Kanakpura Road in 44 Acres: 13 High Court & Supreme Court Judges Site Details
ATR.Judicial Layout – 1st Phase: 84 High Court & Supreme Court Judges Site Details
Sl.No. SLF.No. SDL.No. Site No. Dimension Name Remarks Ref No.
11 852 1793 1381 80X120 Justice N.Venkatachala Suprem court 162
12 1918 1761 1389 80X120 Justice S. Rajendra Babu Suprem court 2
13 1960 1771 1399 80X120 Justice S.Shivaraj Patil Suprem court 3
21 2497 1847 1392 80X120 Justice R.V. Ravindran Suprem court 106
29 821 1779 1413 60X90 Justice K.Jagannatha Shetty Suprem court 119
53 61 1861 1295 60X90 Justice M.N.Venkatachalaiah Suprem court 228
55 124/A 1948 1501 60X90 Justice Balakrishna Herade Suprem court
73 1000 861 50X80 Justice S.Mohan Suprem court 276
81 1875 2070 40X60 Justice G.T.Nanavathi Suprem court 296
1 1731 1773 1383 80X120 Justice P.K. Shamasundar High Court 81
2 1385 1036 1384 80X120 Justice D.P. Hiremath High Court 76
3 1518 1082 1387 80X120 justice M.M.Mirde Alias. Abdul Majid High Court Chief Justice
03
4 1172 891 1401 80X120 Justice A.B. Murgod High Court
5 355 917 1403 80X120 Justice R.G. Desai High Court 254
6 830 1803 1407 80X120 Justice P.A. Kulakarni High Court 163
7 897 640 1415 80X120 Justice P.Jagannath Hege High Court 58
8 598 41 1416 80X120 Justice M.B. Vishwanath High Court 101
9 1471 1072 1419 80X120 Justice M.P. Chinnappa High Court 2
10 823 1792 1421 80X120 Justice M.S.Patil High Court 57
14 849 1747 1408 80X120 Justice D.R. Vittal Rao High Court 184
15 2404 1807 1417 80X120 Justice C.Shivappa High Court 58
16 844 1857 1418 80X120 Justice V.S.Malimath High Court 190
17 2342 1797 1382 80X120 Justice K.Shivashankar Bhat High Court 81
18 2495 1851 1385 80X120 Justice A.J. Sadashiva High Court 179
19 2341 1791 1388 80X120 Justice S.A. Hakeem High Court 58
20 1835 1810 1390 80X120 Justice K.A. Swamy High Court 114
22 2494 1809 1392 80X120 Justice D.M. Chandrashekar High Court 89
23 2514 1918 1394 80X120 Justice Vishwanatha Shetty High Court
24 1959 1769 1395 80X120 Justice Kedambadi Jagannat Shetty High Court 119
25 841 1774 1402 80X120 Justice K.S.Puttaswamy High Court 140
26 2503 1919 1402 80X120 Justice K.H.N.Kuranga High Court 312
27 1611 1802 1411 60X90 Justice H.G.Balakrishna High Court 386
28 825 1775 1412 60X90 Justice Doddakalegowda (Smt. Yeshodamma) High Court 76
30 2405 1777 1414 60X90 Justice L.Srinivasa Reddy High Court 167
31 1878 1806 1420 60X90 Justice G.P.Shivaprakash High Court 2
32 845 1788 1422 60X90 Justice M.Ramajois High Court 162
33 1338 1789 1232 60X90 Justice Justice S.R.Venkateshmurthy High Court 279
34 2496 1830 1267 60X90 Justice R.Ramakrishna High Court 153
35 1418 1081 1288 60X90 Justice B.Padmaraj High Court 1
36 1477 1805 1356 60X90 Justice N.D.Venkatesh High Court 73
37 217 1496 1470 60X90 Justice R.G.Vidyanathan High Court 81
38 2038 1780 1471 60X90 Justice S. Venkataraman High Court
39 1652 1243 1472 60X90
Justice M.S.Rajendra Prasad
High Court 6
40 1579 1353 1473 60X90 Justice Manjula Challur High Court 2
41 1577 1141 1474 60X90 Justice K.Bhakthavatsalam High Court 33
42 1088 934 1475 60X90 Justice B.M.Mallikarjuna High Court 225
43 1400 1067 1476 60X90 Justice H.N.Narayana High Court 69
44 914 772 1480 60X90 Justice Md. Anwar High Court 7
45 2358 1893 859/A 60X90 Justice B.K.Somashekar High Court
46 1188 1032 1269 60X90 Justice B.K.Sanglad High Court 162
47 2504 1836 1266 60X90 Justice G.C. Bharuka High Court 161
48 2498 1852 1268 60X90 Justice V.P.Mohan Kumar High Court 179
49 2500 1854 1270 60X90 Justice P.Krishnamurthy High Court 182
50 2499 1839 1271 60X90 Justice Kumara Raja Rathnam High Court 182
51 2501 1840 1272 60X90 Justice J.Eshwara Prasad High Court 162
52 2501 1837 1273 60X90 Justice T.S Thakur High Court 162
54 828 1595 1453 60X90 Justice A.K.Laksheshwara High Court 67
56 2512 1943 1253 60X90 Justice Y.Bhaskar Rao High Court 300
57 2929 1992 1264 60X90 Justice V.Gopala Gowda High Court 345
58 2513 1920 2118 60X90 Justice V.K.Singal High Court 279
59 257/A 2024 859/C 60X90 Justice S.R.Nayak High Court
60 2511 1877 859/D 60X90 Justice H.L.Dattu High Court 225
61 2518 1916 2118/A 60X90 Justice S.R.Bannurmath High Court 400
62 3000 2034 2118/B 60X90 Justice K.L.Manjunath High Court
63 2981 2030 2118/C 60X90 Justice A.V.Srinivasareddy High Court
64 1578 1245 1052 50X80 Justice V.G.Sabahit High Court 39
65 819 591 1337 50X80 Justice S.B.Majage High Court 13
66 899 1109 1342 50X80 Justice G.Patri Basavanagowda High Court 400
67 820 1153 1886 50X80 Justice G.N.Sabahit (Janaki) High Court 106
68 2500 1872 981/B 50X80 Justice Hulvadi G.Ramesh High Court 212
69 1924 1743 981/D 50X80 Justice K.Ramanna High Court 264
70 813 590 1296/8 50X80 Justice K.Ramachandraiah High Court
71 2466 1768 863 50X80 Justice B.N.Krishna High Court 267
72 1863 1296/11 50X80 Justice Chandrashekaraiah High Court 201
74 1004 862 50X80 Justice N.Y.Hanumanthappa High Court 257
75 1725 864 50X80 Justice S.R. Rajashekara Murthy High Court 257
76 1801 858 50X80 Justice M.Ramakrishna High Court
77 27 362/2 50X80 Justice Chidananda Ullal High Court
78 623 1922 1439 40X60 Justice C.N.Ashwathanarayana Rao High Court
79 115/A 1939 239/15 40X60 Justice M.S.Nesargi High Court
80 1917 2068 40X60 Justice T.J.Chouta High Court
82 1956 2094 40X60 Justice R.V.Vasanthkumar High Court 228
83 2025 2093 40X60 Justice R.Gururajan High Court 407
84 1 1 40X60 Justice P.V.Reddy High Court 383
Other High Court & Supreme Court Judges Site Details not included in Judicial Layout – 1st Phase, which are missing in ATR report; are as follows
Sl.No. SLF.No. SDL.No. Site No. Dimension Name Remarks Ref No.
1 1064 80×50 D.Souza Robinson Present Karnataka Legislature Secretary 146
2 1406 121×89 Justice B.M. Chandrashekariah [HC Judge] 58
3 1425 40×60 Basavaraj K.N. Patil Elevated, HC Judge In 1994 from BDA Advocate, as he conspired with Society 5
4 384 40×60 R.Venkatesh HC Judge 5
5 1281 60×90 H.C. Puttaswamy HC Judge 38
6 1318 90×50 V.G.Mahajan HC Judge 72
7 1897 40×60 Gundappa Dasai HC Judge 119
8 1452 60×90 K. Sreedhar Rao HC Judge
9 1416 120×80 M.B. Viswanath HC Judge 101
10 1271 60×90 Kumar Rajaratnam Chief Justice of Jharkhand 353
11 2013/B 50×40 Aravind S. Pachhapure [(Vigilance)+Spl Judge to hear TN CM Jaya Corroption Case 446
12 2102 40x60 B.S.SrinivasaRao HC Judge 204
13 1820 30x50 S.Rajendra Prasad HC Judge 205
14 1827 30x50 Puttaswamy HC Judge 233
15 1149 60x40 Kali Mahamed Mujeebullah Judge / HC Registrar 244
16 1743 60x40 Ravi B. Naik HC Judge 245
17 981/4 100x20 R.G.Desai HC Judge 254
18 2098 40x60 B.Srinivas Rao HC Judge 257
19 579 80x40 Roopa R. Sabhahit HC Judges' Daughter/wife 321
20 68 60x40 D.G. Chinnappa HC Judge 337
21 528 30x40 S. Prabhakara Jois Bihar Governor, RamaJois Relative 348
23 1478 60x90 T.Abdual Mujeeb HC Registrar + Judge 184
Judicial Layout Phase 2; Talgatpura on Kanakpura Road in 44 Acres: 13 High Court & Supreme Court Judges Site Details
Sl.No. SLF.No. SDL.No. Site No. Dimension Name Remarks Ref No.
1 222 80x50 Justice Kumar.N., High Court Sitting Judge 01
2 221 80x50 V.Jagannathan High Court Sitting Judge 02
3 203 80x50 Justice Ashok B.Hinchigeri High Court Sitting Judge 03
4 205 80x50 Justice Mohan Shanthana Goudar, High Court Sitting Judge 03
5 201 80x50 Justice Anand Byrareddy, High Court Sitting Judge 03
6 193 80x50 Justice Abdul Nazeer High Court Sitting Judge 03
7 202 80x50 Justice Ajit J. Gunjal High Court Sitting Judge 04
8 176 80x50 Kumara Swamy C.R High Court Sitting Judge 08
9 194 80x50 Ajit .C.Kabbin High Court Sitting Judge 08
10 220 80x50 Justice Patil Nananath High Court Sitting Judge 04
11 213 80x50 Siddappa.K.B High Court Judge 02
12 70 80x50 Farooq A.M. HC Judge 08
13 204 80x50 Nagmohandas H.N 04
Chief Justice of India Mr. Justice A.M. Ahmedi, was allotted with a site no. 2069; which he got it registered in the name of A.R. Rasheea Khatoon , who is learnt to be Justice Ahmedi's married daughter.
This site was allotted by the society in lieu of the then Chief Justice Mr. Ahmedi had agreed to dismiss the S.L.P.'s arising of KAR High Court Judgment [where in 28 sitting Judges of High Court were respondents].
Having the dismissed the S.L.P.’s this site came to be allotted.
The division bench has rejected the appeal Jan 2011. What is the stand of Lic? Will good sene prevail na d make payments ?
Mandarins sitting in Fin. Ministry will not allow LIC to move sensibly in the matter to implement the court judgement .
when the time to appeal against the Jan 2011 judgement of Rajasthn High court expires. If no action is contemplated, can an EP be moved? 5 states are going to poll in May 2011 where the ruling congress is involved.
Please check the e-mail address of Madam Sonia Gandhi and let me know the correct address at Girdhar04@rediffmail.com. The mail sent to hear at soniagandhi@sandad.nic.in bounced twice. Thanks
Girdhar